Sept 20th 2007:
Introduction letter to the Judges and Crown Councils in my case files:
Federal case file # 182787-1 and Provincial case file # 191280-1
Attached is a very strong Biblical defense to the matters before both files created from one event, namely:
- My desire to push civil disobedience to attract a challenge in court; in order to turn a ripple into a tsunami
I’m convinced that under this new colore officii [economic duress], the form is possessed in evil reincarnate.
On my pot charges # 182787-1 I’m just entering these documents to the Crown and in the Registry to be forwarded to Judge Bagnal. In the event that this court will not recognize my claim of right to sell pot with my secular or religious argument, at my October 5th court date, then Jacob is turning down a Banquet invitation
- If this judge can’t ‘see’ the perversion in <you ‘must obey’ respondeat superior>, then I truly pity the tribe.
- If you can’t ‘see’ evil in subverting Democracy to protect Sir Salmond’s paper dragons, then pay the price.
- As I see it, in the event that you can’t even see that you’re being tested, then you’re not worth saving.
- As I see it, the real threat is not that pot is being legalized; [it’s inevitable] it’s who is legalizing it. If it wasn’t for the liability of exposing my greater cause, then it would be less of a problem. But then frankly this is just bullshit on top of bullshit, because when faced with activists with ‘less of a problem’, just motivates you to see just another footstool for the law’s abandonment of positive law. You created this legal fiction where no one is accountable, and this double edge sword stops anyone’s ability to do anything about the form being perverted
In regard to this perverted case file # 191280-1: ‘if’ it was not holding such horrifically tragic consequences,
it would be laughable. The Attorney General’s Office has been caught ‘flying a kite’ on a trumped up charge, & it creates the same ‘criminal breath of trust’ charges as Libby Davies is facing [except radically worse, due to the kite]
- As I read the particulars, [or is it the lack of particulars], you are repeating what Rome did to disenfranchise its citizens. To act on blank Affidavits is so effective at undermining the public trust in being protected by a lawful society that you truly deserve the consequences of the despair it breeds.
- If I fail to convince you is not my problem, mine is to not shrink, and if you think that means that I need to succeed, then you’ll repeat it again by blaming your lack of faith on the messenger, once more
Frankly, no one in the Crown talks to me, so I really don’t know if you’re deliberately creating this never-ending pit of liability through stupidity or by design [your way to comply] Mine is not to judge, just to test your heart
As I see it, in law, since there is no matter to the accused, then the Crown is charging God with being a nuisance, and they want to prohibit ‘everything’ from being delivered [you wished to be ignored and voila you got it]
- I give clear NOTICE here: as far as I’m concerned, your orders preclude /prohibit me from doing God’s business with you. Your Sheriffs smiled and then defended their shameless behavior of acting on this blank Affidavit; so you’re either doing this willingly to set yourself up, or you really are so pathetically perverted
- This file truly contains the ways and means of being a default judgment that can only be called:
Sir John Salmond’s blind siding elephant; and it’s meaningless for me to speculate, you’re position
- Other than to point out that all Elements of ‘a make-over’ are in place to achieve the form’s goal
“The hope of mankind is always that a new generation may begin to make the world over quickly”- Archie Cox
As I see it, an Act of Supremacy Charter Challenge is exactly what the form needs, and you know it.
In law, a Charter Challenge can be submitted by anyone, and this means no outlandish damage award,
As I see it, by barring me from even filing papers, the Crown now must take the initiative to forward my file to a tribunal, or watch it drop, and in this way Israel must surrender to [the flame] a path of each tribe’s own choosing
Take my word for it, I’m aware that biblical scholars say the one who challenges Jacob is the antichrist, but then it says that he is not to be pre-judged until they know what the message of righteousness is.
‘Upholding Creation’ holds all the Essential Elements to be God’s promise to a total about face [metanoia]
- It’s the most benevolent interpretation possible of ‘the new Covenant makes Jacob turn away from godliness’
The message is the medium: The message [not the messenger] triggers so many ‘ifs’ that it’s called tribulations
King George’s registry was defrauded, not me, all I want is to return to a lawful society, and this ‘outlandish’ damage award will do exactly that. Under no means do I ever want the title to this registry. It’s not my glory.
- Why Jacob will not take a chance on love, by paying all debt and keep the change; is beyond me
- We are only at the starting blocks of witnessing and participating in the comfort of Paradise on earth,
This comfort is found in your heart not your head; your head will only give you grey hair [Jesus on oaths]
|